Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 40(16), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2009593

ABSTRACT

Background: Cancer patients (pts) were among the first to receive vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 (vac). However, their attitude towards as well as experience with vac remain unclear. Methods: Between 04-11/2021 cancer pts at our university cancer center completed a baseline (BL) and follow-up (FU) questionnaire (Q) containing multiple choice questions and ten eleven-level Likert items ranging from 1 (“totally disagree”) to 11 (“totally agree”). Data was analyzed using Student's t-test or Chi-square test. Results: 219 pts (43% female) completed BLQ (110 FUQ). Mean age was 64 (24-87) years. 82% had solid tumors, 93% were on active therapy (80% chemotherapy). 4% had history of COVID-19. 78% had already received at least one vac at BL, mainly BNT162b2 (91%) or ChAdOx1-S (8%). Only 1% refused vac. Most pts completely agreed to “definitely get vaccinated” (82%) and completely disagreed with “vac is dispensable due to COVID-19 being no serious threat” (82%;more dissent among men, p = 0.037) or “being against vaccination in general” (81%). Self-assessment as member of a risk group (p = 0.03) and fear of COVID-19 (p = 0.002) were more common among women. Every third patient (31%) completely agreed to “being afraid of COVID-19”, every second thinks “SARSCoV-2 infection would be very dangerous” (56%). Only 41% expressed “complete confidence in the vaccine being safe” and 37% “not being afraid of side effects”. Fear of side effects (SE) was more common among women (p = 0.0016), pts with solid tumors (p = 0.05), with GI tumors (p < 0.0001) and below mean age (p = 0.006). The latter expressed less “confidence in the vaccine being safe” (p = 0.0029). At FUQ, most pts (91%) reported their vac to be well tolerated, 44% reported no SE, especially men (p = 0.001) and pts above age average (p = 0.002). Most common SE was local pain at injection site (36%), which was more frequent among women (p = 0.002), younger pts (p = 0.024) and pts with solid tumors (p = 0.04). Other common SE included fatigue (18%) and myalgia (8%). No thromboembolic events occurred. Only 3 pts had their therapy postponed due to SE. Almost all pts felt retrospectively sufficiently informed about vac and possible SE (94%), would have it again (88%) and agree to get it yearly, if recommended (78%). After vac, pts felt safe meeting friends or family (91%) or shopping (62%). Vacation (32%), work (22%), public transport (21%) or sports (19%) were considered less safe (less frequent among men, p < 0.05). Most pts (70%) did not feel that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively influenced their treatment and regarded the hospitals protective measures as adequate (91%). Conclusions: Willingness to get vac is high among cancer pts and vac is well tolerated in this sensitive cohort. However, concerns about vac safety remain an issue. Those as well as gender differences need to be addressed to increase vac rates and tolerability. The present results may help identify pts that benefit from more detailed pre-vac consultation.

2.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 40(16), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2005655

ABSTRACT

Background: CRC still is one of the leading causes of cancer related death though prognosis has improved through guideline based management. The COVID-19 pandemic lead to re-allocation of resources subordinating all sections of care for CRC patients. We present data on changes of CRC care during the pandemic from 22 German AIO CC and our high volume Institute of Pathology (pathology). Methods: Data was collected retrospectively comparing the months (mo) of the first wave (fw) (4-6/2020) and second wave (sw) (11-12/2020) of the pandemic with corresponding periods (cp) in 2019 focusing on the number of precancerous (ICD-O/0+2) and malignant (ICD-O/ 3+6) colorectal lesions (CRL) diagnosed by our pathology, the number/stage of primary diagnoses (PD) and the number of surgeries (surg) at AIO CC. There, quality criteria of CRC care were also assessed (number of PD discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board (tb), received social service (soc)/ psychological (psy) counseling or recruited into a clinical trial). Statistical analysis was performed using students t-test for paired data. Results: Numbers of CRL detected upon histology (row 1-3), number of cases, surg and quality criteria from AIO CC (row 4-9) are displayed in the table. We saw a dip in diagnosed CRL and number of surg (p=0.007) only during fw, whereas PD dipped significantly in both waves. A significant reduction in diagnosis of stage III CRC was detected for 2019 vs. 2020 (p=0.001), not for other stages. Quality criteria showed a significant reduction in clinical trial inclusion, a small dip in soc/psy counseling and persistently high tb presentation. Conclusions: We detected a significant decrease of premalignant lesions and primary cancers during the first year of the pandemic which may impact cancer mortality in the future. Certified German CC provided CRC care with significant reduction in clinical trial inclusion only, suggesting high stability of established certified cancer care infrastructure.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL